Introduction to Audience Engagement

Updated 4 Oct 2026

Audience engagement refers to the relationship between a publisher and its audience. Although most publishers recognize its importance, definitions and approaches to engagement vary widely. However, the shared goal remains clear: to convert visits into meaningful outcomes. These include growing purposeful reach, exploring the most effective narrative techniques, and supporting data-informed decision-making among journalists and editors. This project examines how different news organizations approach audience engagement.

In this project, Elements of Audience Engagement, I examine the concept, roles, and practical methods associated with audience engagement for publishers. Given the diversity of resources and strategies across organisations, my aim is to identify the core principles and foundational practices of successful audience work. The project also explores how audience engagement has evolved in journalism, where its principles originated, what has changed, and where it is heading. From these insights, I intend to build a toolkit that can help newsrooms of all sizes strengthen their day-to-day efforts by focusing on their most vital asset: their audience.

How audience engagement evolved

I've grouped the story into five eras. Each boundary is drawn from the research linked below; the framing is my own. Every era changed how people find the news. None of them changed the questions underneath.

A Nordic note on paying for news

Where things stand now

News consumption is once again undergoing rapid change. Audiences are moving away from traditional channels such as direct visits to news websites, which have dropped by 10 percentage points since 2018. Instead, people, especially younger audiences, are turning to YouTube, WhatsApp, TikTok, and other platform-based environments where short-form video, creators, influencers, and algorithmic recommendations increasingly shape how news is accessed.

Media behaviour differs between markets, and so does the craft of audience development. That was the biggest reason I started this project. As the other chapters of this guide show, big changes in media have always been a reaction to a market shift, and the craft has followed the money time and again. Digital audience development has evolved fastest in the markets where the direct relationship between publisher and audience was challenged. Where that relationship held, audience work grew inside the subscription business of the print era. Six of the nine organisations I interviewed are American, so my view of the craft leans that way.

Perhaps because of all this, digital audience development is still an emerging discipline in Finland, and not a moment too soon.

We don't have a team like an engagement or audience engagement team. But we do it at every level, and in product development too. […] We're still at a very early stage.

Anu Vilkman, Yle

In the 2026 Digital News Report, more Finns aged 18 to 24 came across news online through social media than by going directly to news sites, 50% against 42%.

Share who came across news online through direct access and through social media

  • FinlandFIN
  • United StatesUSA
  • United KingdomUK
  • Direct access
  • Social media
020406080%2014201620182020202220242026FIN31%USA49%UK36%FIN65%USA26%UK47%

Survey question: “Thinking about how you got news online (via computer, mobile or any device) in the last week, which were the ways in which you came across news stories? Please select all that apply.”

Source: Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2014–2026.

Show the data as a table
YearFinlandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
Direct accessSocial mediaDirect accessSocial mediaDirect accessSocial media
2014572433284517
2015632836355228
2016622435354725
2017672939425430
2018702938395329
2019652835375430
2020682934395030
2021712728315127
2022713131344629
2023693429374728
2024703229404631
2025722929474732
2026653126494736

At the same time, the complex relationship between journalism and social media remains unresolved, while platform volatility, the growing role of aggregators, and generative AI all point to a broader reshaping of the information ecosystem. The Reuters Institute’s Digital News Report 2026 shows that AI chatbots and interfaces are already beginning to function as news sources in their own right: 10% of respondents across markets use them for news each week, up from 7% a year earlier, rising to 17% among under-25s.

Share who used AI chatbots as a source of news

Weekly use of AI chatbots as a source of news, 2025 and 2026, with the change in percentage points
Market20252026Change, points
All markets7%10%+3
Finland3%5%+2
United States7%6%−1
United Kingdom3%4%+1

Survey question: “Which, if any, of the following have you used in the last week as a source of news? Please select all that apply.”

Country figures rest on 2,015 to 2,076 respondents each, so a one-point change is within normal survey variation. Source: Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2025–2026.

Traditional media business models such as subscriptions and advertising have shifted online, but the steady decline of print revenue and the shrinking share of digital advertising income have forced many publishers to reconsider their long-term sustainability, revenue streams and purpose.

In response, the past decade has witnessed the rise of audience engagement specialists: professionals who connect journalists, communities, platforms, and products. Their role keeps changing as audiences encounter journalism through creator-led platforms, aggregators, and AI assistants.

AI is also changing the work itself: audience developers can use it to speed up tasks such as summarizing audience signals, testing headlines, repackaging stories, translating content, and identifying patterns in data. That makes AI literacy crucial, both for using these tools effectively and for understanding how journalism is surfaced, summarized, sourced, attributed, and sometimes misrepresented outside publishers’ own environments. In the EBU and BBC’s 2025 News Integrity in AI Assistants study, journalists evaluated responses generated by ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and Perplexity across 18 countries, and 14 languages. The study found that 45% of responses contained at least one significant issue, 31% had significant sourcing problems, and 20% had significant accuracy issues.

What history is for

In every era, the dynamics between audiences, publishers, and platforms have shifted. So far, publishers have rarely managed to define a position within those dynamics that works in their favour. A news executive interviewed for the Tow Center's Journalism Zero report named the reason:

"The challenge that we have right now is that news, as an industry, tends not to learn terribly well from our past experiences and mistakes."

Journalism Zero: How Platforms and Publishers are Navigating AI, Tow Center for Digital Journalism, 2025

The mechanics of discovery keep changing. The questions underneath, who the audience is and why they should care, do not. Newsrooms that treat each disruption as unprecedented keep relearning the same lessons; the ones that recognise the pattern adapt faster.

Footnotes

  1. Philip M. Napoli, Audience Economics: Media Institutions and the Audience Marketplace (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003). ↩

  2. Pablo J. Boczkowski, Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers, Inside Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004). ↩

  3. Ramón Salaverría, "Digital Journalism: 25 Years of Research. Review Article," Profesional de la Información 28, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.ene.01 ↩

  4. Jane B. Singer, "Online Journalists: Foundations for Research into Their Changing Roles," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4, no. 1 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00088.x ↩

  5. Caitlin Petre, The Traffic Factories: Metrics at Chartbeat, Gawker Media, and The New York Times (New York: Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia Journalism School, 2015). ↩

  6. Emily Bell and Taylor Owen, The Platform Press: How Silicon Valley Reengineered Journalism (New York: Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia Journalism School, 2017). ↩

  7. Nic Newman, Journalism, Media and Technology Predictions 2016 (Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2016). ↩

  8. Platforms and Publishers: The End of an Era (New York: Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia Journalism School, 2019). ↩

  9. Athena Chapekis and Anna Lieb, "Google Users Are Less Likely to Click on Links When an AI Summary Appears in the Results" (Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 22 July 2025). ↩

  10. Peter Brown and Klaudia Jaźwińska, Journalism Zero: How Platforms and Publishers Are Navigating AI (New York: Tow Center for Digital Journalism, May 2025). ↩

  11. Mikko Grönlund, Mikko Villi and Marko Ala-Fossi, "Press Subsidies and Business Performance of Newspaper Publishing in Three Nordic Media Welfare States," Media and Communication 12 (2024), article 7570, 6. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7570 ↩ ↩2

  12. Trine Syvertsen, Gunn Enli, Ole J. Mjøs and Hallvard Moe, The Media Welfare State: Nordic Media in the Digital Era (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2014). ↩

Help us improve and grow

This is a living document. If you have feedback, suggestions, or resources to share, we would love to hear from you.

Get in touch